|
|
| *Loan,banking and credit>>>child tax |
Shouldn't there be a big tax break for those who do not have children? |
People without children do not use the public education system, other than their childhood which was taxed of their parents ( and is fair because the PARENTS should be responsible).... those without children who also earn their way without welfare consequently leave those resources intact, and should only pay taxes for what is neccessary to non-parents... highways, military defense and government employee wages to keep our country safe (Police, Fire, Administrative). We need to reward those without children with a tax incentive to promote restraint...thus lessening the burden of an overcrowded, resource-draining population exploding at the seams. Your opinions on a tax break for non-parents.? Only regarding the taxes for public schools. Also, when someone's children are grown and out of the public school system, the public school tax should no longer be due from them. We also need to penalize those who have lots of children recklessly. They, more than any, are a burden on the tax system, since many of the children and their parents end up using public funds in the form of welfare, health clinics, jails, and social services program. If ya can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em. Yes. I have always said that as why should we educate others and all their babies when we have chosen not to have a houseful of kids, Great question Well gee, let's see, wether or not they are your children , they are the future. Unless you want a future with a whole bunch of stupid adults running the country cause people like you didn't want to pay for it. It's a fact of life. What a lame comparison. Us not wanting to help you kill yourself is NOT the same as paying taxes so children can go to school. You choose to smoke, therefore there is a 50/50 chance that you will have no FUTURE cause you'll probably be dead from lung cancer, children, however ARE our FUTURE. Deal with it. I agree!! Why do people on welfare get a tax return at all??!! good points.. but then I haven't had a fire at my house, should I still have to pay for the fire department? Rewarding those without children to reward restraint? Are you kidding me?? That's just ridiculous! I have to ask.. are you a virgin? If you are, then you DESERVE a tax break.. of not, then you haven't exercised restraint and you're no longer entitled. Schools, fire, police, military etc. etc. etc. are all governmental services and it's all part of living in our country. Tax shelters and deductions are all getting scarcer and scarcer. The credit for having children is no where NEAR what it cost to have and support a child... Your credit will have to be the ability to go on vacation, go out to eat, drive the kind of car you wish and live in the relative freedom that a parent of children cannot enjoy. You can drive a two-seater and not have to worry about fitting the rugrats in the back.. enjoy that. Well, this theory should work...let's just see? Ok so we reward people for having no children, we all like rewards yes? So ok, no one has any more kids and everyone gets rewarded...gee, no kids = no need for schools, or teachers, or anything related to children...including...wait for it....NO FUTURE!! Sooner or later under your brilliant theory, if everyone follows it, we end up with NO PEOPLE...perfect, if your an insect. Lmao, I love hearing these half baked theories, funnier than Comedy Channel on a good night |
| Tags |
| tax year income tax business tax car tax child tax cigarette tax corporate tax estate tax import tax inheritance tax |
SiteMap--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster For personal non-commercial use only. |