*Loan,banking and credit>>>health insurance

How is a law requiring car insurance any where near a mandatory health insurance law?

Hear out these two big differences before answering:

1) You can lawfully not have car insurance if you don't drive. The only way you can lawfully not have health insurance is by committing suicide (which to me sounds counter to the point of requiring health insurance)

2) Mandatory car insurance is so that you can pay someone else if you damage their property. Mandatory health insurance only protects the individual from him or herself.

Can anyone reason with these dems before they throw this rights-squashing law on us?

If they can convince their constituents, it only goes to show who their followers are.

How did they possibly manage to equate these two things, which have absolutely nothing in common?

Welcome to HUGE government!
Car insurance is not mandatory

Financial reponsibility is mandatory.

All you have to do is post a bond and no insurance is necessary.
Wrong medical insurance often picks up costs associated with auto accidents.
mandutory car inchurence!?
Nanny staters love those laws.
We all die dan, but we all didn't die while drinking. People, please give a hoot and don't pollute our cemetery's will untimely deaths by drunk drivers. Thank you, DAN, for allowing me to take this opportunity to say a word against mandatory pigeon droppings and if you ever run for office, DAN, You will definitely get my vote for one who knows knows now we can drive to death, right dan?