|
|
| *Loan,banking and credit>>>house insurance |
Do you think that the taxpayer should foot the bill for those who didn't get house insurance? |
in the recent floods here in the U.K. I reckon there should be a whip round for our own for once; we're quick enough to give to other countries in need.. I'd be devastated if I lost everything in river and sewage water.. And some insurance companies have refused to cover people after all the other previous floods. I'd rather taxes go to this than the corrupt EU! No. Its a risk they took having no insurance, so why the hell should we tax payers fork out for them. NO - they should have bought insurance like the rest of us. The 拢14M should be used to repair roads etc not on people who expect others to bail them out and spend the money on booze and fags instead If I decided I can't afford insurance, or opted not to have it and something like this happened, I wouldn't expect someone to come up with the money to put things right. I would first of all kick myself for being so stupid, then take out insurance whether I could afford it or not. Generally speaking, no. But it is important to be aware that after the floods of recent years, many insurance companies will not provide cover for floods, as it costs them too much money!!! This is particularly true in the areas which are most frequently affected by flooding. Therefore, alot of the people affected by the floods did have house insurance, they just can't get any help!!! Which I think is an absolute disgrace, and in these situations, yes, I think the taxpayer should foot the bill. definately not no... we have to take responsibility for ourselves and possessions. |
| Tags |
| car insurance automobile insurance boat insurance burial insurance homeowner insurance house insurance contents insurance liability insurance life insurance disability insurance dog insurance |
SiteMap--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster--Resource of HR For personal non-commercial use only. |